JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #301598

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 219
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: WNAR
Abstract - #301598
Title: Methods for Matching Subjects on Baseline Outcome Measures Prior to Randomization
Author(s): Misook Park*+ and Robert E. Johnson
Companies: Virginia Commonwealth University and Virginia Commonwealth University
Address: Dept. of Biostatistics, Richmond, VA, 23298-0032,
Keywords: clustering ; matching ; baseline measures
Abstract:

Matching subjects prior randomization may increase the power to detect differences between subgroups by reducing the variance of the differences. Common methods include pairing where two subjects are matched on one or more characteristics. Matched groups of size greater than two may be formed in a similar way. One approach to the latter is to use an algorithm for identifying clusters of observations. Once identified, subjects within each cluster are randomized to the study arms. It is necessary to place constraints on the clustering algorithm, namely, each cluster must have at least the same number of subjects as arms of the study. For example, a hierarchical method for identifying clusters may result in one or more clusters having less than the required number of subjects. These clusters must then be fused with a neighboring cluster. This fusion, though necessary, may result in a nonoptimal result. For example, variation may be improved by breaking apart the newly formed cluster. We will explore adaptations of known methods in the presence of such constraints. Hierarchical methods such as the centroid and average linkage will be considered in addition to an all-clusters approach.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004