JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #301589

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 224
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: Biometrics Section
Abstract - #301589
Title: Model Selection for the Linear Mixed Model in which the Response is Transformed
Author(s): Matthew J. Gurka*+ and Lloyd J. Edwards and Pranab K. Sen
Companies: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Address: , Durham, NC, 27713,
Keywords: model selection ; linear mixed model ; longitudinal data ; transformations ; AIC ; residual likelihood
Abstract:

Shi and Tsai (2002) proposed a residual likelihood criterion (RIC) for univariate linear model selection using a residual likelihood approach to estimation. The selection criterion is based on the expected Kullback-Leibler information of the residual log-likelihood of the fitted model. The Box-Cox transformation was treated as a special case of a generalized version of the univariate linear model. The methodology of the RIC is extended to the linear mixed model for longitudinal data in which the response is transformed using the Box-Cox approach. Consistency properties of the RIC proved theoretically for the univariate case are shown to hold true for the transformed mixed model as well. Extensive simulations are performed to assess the performance of the RIC in selecting the "best" transformed mixed model for both large and small samples. Specifically, the ability of the RIC to select the correct fixed effects structure for a given mixed model with a transformed response in both large and small sample settings is examined, and we compare its performance to those of existing criteria used in the linear mixed model, such as the AIC and BIC.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004