JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #301391

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 309
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 AM
Sponsor: Section on Survey Research Methods
Abstract - #301391
Title: Classification of Address Register Coverage Rates--A Field Study
Author(s): Gavin Thompson*+ and Claude Turmelle
Companies: Statistics Canada and Statistics Canada
Address: 120 Parkdale, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0T6, Canada
Keywords: Canadian Labour Force Survey ; address register ; coverage rates ; sample frame
Abstract:

Every 10 years the Canadian Labour Force Survey (CLFS) undergoes a review of its sample design. This time the use of the Canadian Address Register (CAR) was examined to replace the costly listing process. The CLFS has a two-stage design. For each Primary Sampling Unit (PSU) selected a complete listing of all dwellings must be compiled in order to select the final sample. This list is normally compiled by an interviewer touring the entire PSU and noting each dwelling. The use of the CAR would enable us to eliminate this step in some PSUs (type 1), and in others potentially improve the quality of the lists by being used as an aide (type 2). In some PSUs the coverage rates of the CAR is too poor to be used (type 3). A field study in five cities, totaling 55,000 households, was completed in December 2003. This paper will describe the design of the field test, review the overcoverage and undercoverage rates of the CAR and present the results obtained with both methods of listing. Also, we will discuss the methods used for determining which of the three types the 8,000 CLFS selected PSUs fall into.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004