JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #300891

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 383
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 : 2:00 PM to 3:50 PM
Sponsor: ENAR
Abstract - #300891
Title: Handling Missing Observations in the Estimation of Differences in Proportions from Clustered Data in a Matched-pair Design
Author(s): Carsten Schwenke*+ and Jaakko Nevalainen
Companies: Schering AG and Schering AG
Address: Muellerstrasse 170-178, Berlin, International, 13342, Germany
Keywords: missing values ; matched-pair ; clustered data ; binary outcomes
Abstract:

In diagnostic studies, often the difference in the sensitivity or specificity of two diagnostic procedures is to be estimated. We consider studies with a matched-pair design, where all procedures are applied to each patient. With more than one observational unit per patient, e.g., several tumors in the same patient, statistical methods are to be used, which account for the clustering effect. Obuchowski (1998) developed such methods for complete datasets. In terms of clinical studies, this approach is often equivalent to the per-protocol-analysis, where incomplete cases are excluded. For an intent-to-treat analysis, these methods are insufficient. We propose a simple extension, where incomplete datasets can be analyzed without excluding incomplete cases. We divide the full sample into a set of data with complete cases and another set of data with incomplete cases. The differences in proportions are estimated for each subset considering the correlation between patients for the complete data and the clustering effect within the patient for both datasets. Then the two estimated differences are combined by appropriate weights.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004