JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #300812

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 86
Type: Contributed
Date/Time: Monday, August 9, 2004 : 8:30 AM to 10:20 AM
Sponsor: General Methodology
Abstract - #300812
Title: Conditional and Unconditional Confidence Intervals Following a Group Sequential Test
Author(s): Xiaoyin Fan*+ and David L. DeMets
Companies: Merck & Co., Inc. and University of Wisconsin, Madison
Address: 785 Jolly Rd. Bldg. C, Blue Bell, PA, 19422,
Keywords: group sequential ; confidence interval ; conditional coverage ; stopping time
Abstract:

The naïve confidence interval (CI) of the parameter following a group sequential study is biased in terms of the coverage probability. There are several available exact CI methods based on different ways of ordering the two-dimensional test statistics sample space. While those exact CI's maintain the overall coverage probability, the conditional coverage probability at any given stopping stage could be well below the target level. A conditional CI (CCI) method can provide correct conditional coverage using the conditional likelihood inference at the stopping stage. However, the pure CCI method has serious drawbacks such as an unreasonably wide interval and inconsistency with the main hypothesis testing result. A two-step restricted conditional CI (RCCI) is proposed which takes advantage of both the stopping time and the test value at that point. Compared with available methods, numerical results show that the RCCI not only improves the conditional coverage considerably from the exact CI's, but also avoids the major undesirable properties of the CCI. The repeated confidence interval (RCI) method is compared as well but also found less appealing than the RCCI.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004