JSM 2004 - Toronto

Abstract #300427

This is the preliminary program for the 2004 Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto, Canada. Currently included in this program is the "technical" program, schedule of invited, topic contributed, regular contributed and poster sessions; Continuing Education courses (August 7-10, 2004); and Committee and Business Meetings. This on-line program will be updated frequently to reflect the most current revisions.

To View the Program:
You may choose to view all activities of the program or just parts of it at any one time. All activities are arranged by date and time.

The views expressed here are those of the individual authors
and not necessarily those of the ASA or its board, officers, or staff.


Back to main JSM 2004 Program page



Activity Number: 101
Type: Topic Contributed
Date/Time: Monday, August 9, 2004 : 10:30 AM to 12:20 PM
Sponsor: WNAR
Abstract - #300427
Title: Developing Measures of Approval for Myositis
Author(s): Peter A. Lachenbruch*+ and Lisa Rider and Frederick Miller
Companies: U.S. Food and Drug Administration and National Institutes of Health and National Institutes of Health
Address: 1401 Rockville Pike, HFM-215, Rockville, MD, 20852,
Keywords: myositis ; index development ; CART
Abstract:

The myositis syndromes are a group of autoimmune diseases characterized by chronic inflammation of muscle resulting in muscle weakness. We obtained consensus rating of improvement from a panel of clinicians. They obtained consensus in 204 of 222 patients. We then selected the variables to develop the index based on the clinician's evaluation of the variable's usefulness.The clinicians ranked the variables on their importance in defining improvement, the number of the variables required for improvement, the amount of improvement in each variable that was needed, and how much worsening could be permitted. Six candidate variables were selected. Third, we developed candidate rules. These were similar to indices used in rheumatoid arthritis and lupus or from exploratory statistical analyses of the data. Fourth, we examined the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the rules. Fifth, a panel of experts in the field selected promising candidate rules for improvement from a set of candidates that excluded poorly performing rules.


  • The address information is for the authors that have a + after their name.
  • Authors who are presenting talks have a * after their name.

Back to the full JSM 2004 program

JSM 2004 For information, contact jsm@amstat.org or phone (888) 231-3473. If you have questions about the Continuing Education program, please contact the Education Department.
Revised March 2004