Keyword Search
Sessions Were Renumbered as of May 19.
Legend:
CC-W = McCormick Place Convention Center, West Building, CC-N = McCormick Place Convention Center, North Building
H = Hilton Chicago, UC= Conference Chicago at University Center
* = applied session ! = JSM meeting theme
|
Keyword Search Criteria: sensitivity returned 47 record(s)
|
|
Sunday, 07/31/2016
|
Reliability of Eyewitness Identification as a Forensic Tool
Karen Kafadar, University of Virginia
2:05 PM
|
Role of Simulations in the Selection of the Primary Estimand and Statistical Methods for Handling Missing Data
Elena Polverejan, Janssen R&D
2:45 PM
|
Big Data Regression and Prediction for High-Throughput Genomic Data
Weiqiang Zhou, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Ben Sherwood, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Zhicheng Ji, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Fang Du, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Jiawei Bai, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Hongkai Ji, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
2:50 PM
|
Sensitivity Analysis of a CD4-Based HIV Incidence Estimation Method
Ruiguang Song, CDC
2:50 PM
|
Sensitivity Analyses to Assess the Missing-at-Random Assumption
Shailaja Suryawanshi, Merck; Anjela Tzontcheva, Merck; Raymond Lam, Merck; Gregory Golm, Merck
3:20 PM
|
Sobol Sensitivity Indices Under Generalized Linear Models
Rong Lu, The Ohio State University; Grzegorz Rempala, The Ohio State University
3:35 PM
|
On the Sensitivity Analysis for Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
Haoda Fu
4:05 PM
|
Integration of Significance Information from Independent Gene Expression Studies
Nusrat Jahan, James Madison University; Aylin Alin, Dokuz Eylul University
4:35 PM
|
Constructed Second Control Groups and Attenuation of Unmeasured Biases
Samuel D. Pimentel, University of Pennsylvania; Dylan Small, University of Pennsylvania; Paul R. Rosenbaum, University of Pennsylvania
4:45 PM
|
|
Monday, 08/01/2016
|
Evaluation of Sensitivity of Statistical Methods That Assume Missing at Random
Takayuki Abe, Keio University School of Medicine; Kazuhito Shiosakai, Daiichi Sankyo Co.; Rachel Roberts, Keio University School of Medicine; Fumiya Sano, Keio University School of Medicine; Manabu Iwasaki, Seikei University
|
Sample Size and Duration of Study in Clinical Trials with Time-to-Event Endpoint
Ryunosuke Machida, Tokyo University of Science; Yosuke Fujii, Pfizer Japan; Takashi Sozu, Tokyo University of Science
|
Comparison of Single Event, Competing Risks, and Frailty-Based Models for Competing Risks Data
Yuliang Liu, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Charity Morgan, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Gary R. Cutter, University of Alabama at Birmingham
|
The Treatment of Missing Data in a Large Cardiovascular Clinical Outcomes Study
Roderick Joseph Little, University of Michigan
11:25 AM
|
Comparison of Single Event, Competing Risks, and Frailty-Based Models for Competing Risks Data
Yuliang Liu, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Charity Morgan, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Gary R. Cutter, University of Alabama at Birmingham
11:55 AM
|
Sharp Sensitivity Bounds for Mediation Under Unmeasured Mediator-Outcome Confounding
Peng Ding, University of California at Berkeley
3:25 PM
|
|
Tuesday, 08/02/2016
|
Sensitivity Analysis for an Unobserved Moderator in RCT-to-Target-Population Generalization of Treatment Effect
Ben Ackerman, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health; Cyrus Ebnesajjad, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Trang Q. Nguyen, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Elizabeth Stuart, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
|
Validation of Sudden Cardiac Death Algorithm
Zoe Bider-Canfield, Kaiser Permanente Southern California; Shuhua Liang, Kaiser Permanente Southern California; T. Craig Cheetham, Kaiser Permanente Southern California
|
Validation of Sudden Cardiac Death Algorithm
Zoe Bider-Canfield, Kaiser Permanente Southern California; Shuhua Liang, Kaiser Permanente Southern California; T. Craig Cheetham, Kaiser Permanente Southern California
8:40 AM
|
Multilevel Multiple Imputation: Tipping Point Sensitivity Analysis Using the JOMO Package in R with Longitudinal Olympic Regeneration in East London (ORiEL) Data
Melanie Smuk, Queen Mary University of London; Matteo Quartagno, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Charlotte Clark, Queen Mary University of London; Stephen Stansfeld, Queen Mary University of London; Steven Cummins, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
9:05 AM
|
Sensitivity Analysis for an Unobserved Moderator in RCT-to-Target-Population Generalization of Treatment Effect
Ben Ackerman, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health; Cyrus Ebnesajjad, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Trang Q. Nguyen, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Elizabeth Stuart, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
9:10 AM
|
Bayesian Estimation of the Three Key Parameters in CT for the National Lung Screening Trial Data
Ruiqi Liu, University of Louisville; Beth Levitt, Information Management Services; Tom Riley, Information Management Services; Dongfeng Wu, University of Louisville
9:20 AM
|
The Effects on Diagnostic Accuracy of Repeated Testing and Decision Rule Design
Jeng Mah, Beckman Coulter Inc.
10:55 AM
|
Making Use of the Predictive Distribution for Missing Data
Gerry Gray, FDA/CDRH
10:55 AM
|
Method Comparison Study for Diagnostic Devices with Dichotomous Output
Bipasa Biswas, FDA/CDRH
11:35 AM
|
Novel Imputation Methods for Binary, Time-to-Event, and Recurrent-Event Outcomes
Michael O'Kelly, Quintiles
11:35 AM
|
Using Power Contours to Assess the Sensitivity of Clinical Trial Design Assumptions
Richard C. Zink, JMP Life Sciences, SAS Institute; Xiaotong Jiang, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
2:35 PM
|
Bayesian Approaches to Modeling Complex Phenomena in Health Applications
Jennifer L. Hill, New York University; Vincent Dorie, New York University; Nicole Carnegie, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee; Masataka Harada, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
2:45 PM
|
Automatic Estimation of Sobol' Indices Based on Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods
Lluís Antoni Jiménez Rugama, Illinois Institute of Technology; Laurent Gilquin, Université de Grenoble Alpes; Clémentine Prieur, Université de Grenoble Alpes; Elise Arnaud, Université de Grenoble Alpes; Hervé Monod, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; Fred Hickernell, Illinois Institute of Technology
3:20 PM
|
|
Wednesday, 08/03/2016
|
Learning Bayesian Update via Shiny: Understanding Bayesian Methods Through Visualization
J. Jack Lee, MD Anderson Cancer Center
|
Practical Guidance and Tools for Rule-Out Sensitivity to Unmeasured Confounding Analyses
Lucy D'Agostino McGowan; Robert Greevy, Vanderbilt University
|
False Discovery Rate Control for Effect Modification in Observational Studies
Bikram Karmakar, University of Pennsylvania; Ruth Heller, Tel-Aviv University; Dylan Small, University of Pennsylvania
9:05 AM
|
Assessing Sensitivity to Unmeasured Confounding in Multilevel Models Using a Simulated Potential Confounder
Nicole Carnegie, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee; Jennifer L. Hill, New York University; Vincent Dorie, New York University
9:50 AM
|
Dynamic Scheduling of the Next Exam in Cancer Screening
Dongfeng Wu, University of Louisville
10:35 AM
|
Discovering Effect Modification in Matched Observational Studies with Multiple Controls
Kwonsang Lee, University of Pennsylvania; Dylan Small, University of Pennsylvania; Paul R. Rosenbaum, University of Pennsylvania
10:50 AM
|
Leveraging Multiple Outcomes in Matched Observational Studies
Colin B. Fogarty, MIT; Dylan Small, University of Pennsylvania
11:05 AM
|
Improving the Balance Between Sensitivity and Specificity for Functional Localization in fMRI Data
Jasper Degryse, Ghent University; Ruth Seurinck, Ghent University; Beatrijs Moerkerke, Ghent University
11:35 AM
|
Approximate Likelihood Methods for Estimation and Prediction in Gaussian Process Regression Models for Computer Experiments
Ryan Parker, SAS Institute; Brian J. Reich, North Carolina State University; Chris Gotwalt, SAS Institute
11:35 AM
|
A Dirichlet Process Functional Approach to Heteroscedastic-Consistent Covariance Estimation and Sensitivity Analysis of Causal Effects
George Karabatsos, University of Illinois at Chicago
2:25 PM
|
Design, Identification, and Sensitivity Analysis for Patient Preference Trials
Teppei Yamamoto, MIT; Dean Knox, MIT; Berinsky Adam, MIT; Matthew Baum, Harvard
2:35 PM
|
Design of Primary and Sensitivity Analyses for Handling Nonfuture Dependence Missing Data in Clinical Trials with an Emphasis on the Type I Error Rate Using Pattern Mixture Model
Lixian Peng, Celgene; Weichung J. Shih, Rutgers University
2:35 PM
|
Efficient Sequential Design of Sensitivity Testing with Small Samples
C F Jeff Wu, Georgia Institute of Technology; Dianpeng Wang, Beijing Institute of Technology
2:55 PM
|
Enhancing the Precision of Small-Sample Sensitivity Tests
David H. Collins, Los Alamos National Laboratory; Michael S. Hamada, Los Alamos National Laboratory; Brian Phillip Weaver, Los Alamos National Laboratory
3:20 PM
|
|
Thursday, 08/04/2016
|
On Assessing the Difficulty of a Clustering Problem: The Introduction of Sensitivity and Specificity to Cluster Analysis
Jonathon O'Brien
8:35 AM
|
Correcting for Measurement Error in Self-Reported Dietary Data from a Longitudinal Lifestyle Intervention Trial Using an External Validation Study
Juned Siddique, Northwestern University; Laurence Freedman, Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research; Raymond Carroll, Texas A&M University; Trivellore Raghunathan, University of Michigan; Elizabeth Stuart, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
9:00 AM
|
The Impact of Sensitivity and Specificity of Case Definition on Vaccine Efficacy Trial Design
Xiaohua Sheng, Sanofi Pasteur; Steven Self, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Ehab Bassily, Sanofi Pasteur; Joshua Chen, Sanofi Pasteur
9:05 AM
|
On the Impact of Informative Nonresponse in Logistic Regression
Joanna Wang, University of Technology Sydney
11:35 AM
|
On Analysis of Longitudinal Clinical Trials with Missing Data Using Reference-Based Imputation
Lei Pang, Merck; Guanghan Liu, Merck Research Laboratories
11:50 AM
|
|
|
